attorny general regional court

Attorney General bats for Regional Court of Appeals to reduce SC’s burden – Burning Issues – Free PDF

Attorney General Bats For Regional Court Of Appeals To Reduce Burden Of Supreme Court

  • While delivering his address on the Constitution Day Celebrations at Vigyan Bhavan, the Attorney General for India KK Venugopal spoke about the need for creation of Court of Appeals in at least 4 regions (North, South, West and East) with 15 judges consisting of 3 benches of 3 judges each.

  • Today we have inherited a system extremely cumbersome where the procedure in the CPC which is a fat book would result necessarily in delaying the disposal of cases.
  • The criminal cases of course have a procedure which gives a full right of defence of the accused, but I think that the cumbersome procedure should be done away with,
  • It should be remembered that as far as the right to access of Justice is concerned, it is a Fundamental Right and being a Fundamental Right it should mean that we give access to justice at reasonable cost and within a reasonable time. 30 years is not a reasonable time.
  • We’re adding 60 judges who would be taking over the cases so that the pendency would be cut down to a very great extent. It would be reduced so that you’ll be able to get the cases disposed of within a period of 3 or 4 years.
  • This would mean that the Supreme Court would not require 34 judges which it has now.
  • Once it is relieved of all this burden of rent control, matrimonial and so on and so on the result of it is that 15 judges sitting in 3 constitution benches of 5 each would be sufficient to dispose of cases of Constitutional Nature something or where death sentence is involved or constitutional requirement of references or so on,” AG said.
  • He further said that today the Supreme Court had expanded its coverage to cases to include every single case decided by the High Court as long as there was an error in judgement, the law had not been stated correctly and that there were serious errors of facts.
  • Now this means that so far as the Supreme Court is concerned, it can’t truly claim to be a constitutional court.
  • You have to remember that so far as western Apex Courts are concerned, they have managed their work in a manner where they are able to dispose of their cases within a period of 2 years.
  • But what is the real situation so far as India is concerned.
  • We find that in Supreme Court list there are criminal cases pending from 2008, civil cases pending from 2009 and if its pending in SC for 12 years then one should consider to account that the cases have come from Trial Courts and High Court’s where they have been pending for 10 years and about 8/10 years in Supreme Court as well.
  • Now in this background it is time to set back in thought as to whether there is a solution.
  • The solution that was suggested in 2010 onwards is that there should be what is known as Courts of Appeal.
  • Most of the western countries, not because they are western, but these are common law countries and we are common law countries as well, most of them so far as they are concerned, they have an intermediate court of appeal between the High Courts and Apex Court of the country and that is a court of appeal which absorbs all these cases of a nature which is other than constitutional case, which the Supreme Court has been doing today but which should be taken over by the Courts of Appeal.
  • The judgments of the Courts of Appeal would be final and there would be no appeal from that.

Latest Burning Issues | Free PDF